@sholzhauer-es , thanks for contributing to the integrations repo, we are slowly introducing integrations to agentless with phase 2 coming up next #14186. ti_anomali is not yet on the list as we need to do further testing and validate agentless is supported. cc @cpascale43

Pinging @elastic/security-service-integrations (Team:Security-Service Integrations)

Hi! We just realized that we haven't looked into this PR in a while. We're sorry! We're labeling this issue as Stale to make it hit our filters and make sure we get back to it as soon as possible. In the meantime, it'd be extremely helpful if you could take a look at it as well and confirm its relevance. A simple comment with a nice emoji will be enough :+1. Thank you for your contribution!

@sholzhauer-es From the Security Service team’s side, I have tested the ti_anomali agentless deployment support on ECH 8.18.0 and later versions, and it appears to be working as expected.
Testing on the Serverless environment and ECH 9.1.* has not yet been completed due to some issue.

Meanwhile, could you please look into resolving the build issue?

@mohitjha-elastic perfect. I'll dive into the build failure and try and resolve it.

🚀 Benchmarks report

Package ti_anomali 👍(1) 💚(0) 💔(1)

To see the full report comment with /test benchmark fullreport

@mohitjha-elastic the build and merge conflicts have been resolved.

@elastic/security-service-integrations Could someone from the team please review the PR?

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Fixed issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
100.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube

💚 Build Succeeded

• Buildkite Build
• Commit: bcc8563

History

• 💚 Build #30196 succeeded 7fd1089
• 💔 Build #30191 failed 8c89259
• 💔 Build #30183 failed 7faf81d
• 💔 Build #28576 failed 16f5389